![]() |
|
|
A REPORT FROM THE
EFCA, ECCE & ACE SEMINAR
EUROPEAN
HARMONISATION OF PROCUREMENT PRACTICES
IN
THE SECTOR OF THE ENGINEERING CONSULTANCY AND ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
Thursday,
21st October 2004
at the Renaissance
Hotel, 19 Rue du Parnasse, Brussels
New
EU Public Procurement Directive:
|
|
ACE,
ECCE and EFCA held a joint seminar on the New EU Public Procurement
Directive on Thursday 21st October 2004.
The venue was the Renaissance Hotel, a short walk from the European
Parliament Building in Brussels. Speakers
included representatives from the three federations, the European
Commission, national Chief Procurement Officers, the cities of Espoo (SF)
and Milan (I), and the American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC).
It highlighted opportunities and potential pitfalls of the new EU
legislation, green public procurement issues, and the U.S.
Qualifications-Based Selection system. ECCE President Yrjoe Matikainen presided over the first session of the morning. Diana Maxwell, ECCE Secretary General, presented ECCE views on the Directive whilst Thomas Maibaum, Chairman of the ACE Taskforce on Public Procurement spoke on behalf of the European Council of Architects and Jean Felix, Chairman of the EFCA Public Procurement Taskforce presented the views of the European Federation of Consultancy Associations. |
|
Above: Commission speakers, Thomas Maibaum (ACE), Jean Felix (EFCA) and Session moderator Yrjoe Matikainen |
|
|
|
|
|
European
Commission speakers Mr. Ugo Bassi, (right) Unit Head in D.G. Internal
Market presented an overview of the Directive whilst his colleague Mr.
Claudio Romanini (left) provided a detailed response to the concerns of
sector representatives.
|
|
In
the course of the seminar participants expressed views on the practical
implications of the Directive in their countries or field of expertise.
One speaker, however, was able to demonstrate transposition since Denmark had
moved quickly to transpose the Directive in mid-September 2004. Mrs.
Larssen of the Danish Competition Authority explained that the rules would be in
force in Denmark in January 2005. The political goal had been to implement
as soon as possible to take advantage of the new rules from an early stage.
Danes considered the swift process offered to be an advantage. On the
negative side the Danes considered the text was still difficult to understand
for the users and would require extensive guidelines for contracting authorities
and entities.
|
An
opportunity to compare European proposals with existing American practice
was provided later in the day when Terry McNulty of ACEC, the American
Council of Engineering Companies, outlined the U.S. Qualifications-Based
Selection (QBS) system. This is used by all U.S. federal agencies, 44
state governments, and many localities throughout the country. Mr.
McNulty explained that the cost of A/E services is typically less than 1%
of life-cycle cost. Under QBS, the owner selects the best qualified
firm and then negotiates price. They consider the advantages
to be that it leads to lower life-cycle costs; fewer change orders; lower
operation and maintenance costs; promotes innovation. The negotiated
process allows for clarification. A
reverse auction process is found in Minnesota, Kentucky and Louisiana.
|
|
For further information please refer to the association web-sites: The Architects Council of Europe www.ace-cae.org ;The European Council of Civil Engineers: www.eccenet.org (‘News’) and The European Federation of Consulting Associations : www.efcanet.org
|
© 2005, ECCE | European Council of Civil Engineers. A Company limited by Guarantee | Registered in England and Wales No. 2916733 |